Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Saturday, December 11, 2004

My favorite Christmas decoration

It's that time of year again, and here's the family decorating a tree. We went the very traditional route and spent the afternoon killing our own tree, and getting a wagon ride, and having hot apple cider with sugar cookies. And then we hauled out the box of Debris from Christmases Past, and spangled the large lump of dying vegetation in our living room with it.

tree decorating

I thought I'd show you my very favorite ornament.

tattered santa

As you can see, it's some scraps of colored paper with string and cotton glued onto it. It's Santa! He's got black stars for eyes and a big red nose and a scraggly white beard. It's cheap and badly battered and I suppose it is actually rather ugly; the kids protest every year when we drag this tattered wreck of a Santa out of the box and drape it over a few branches.

My oldest boy made this when he was in first grade, back in Utah, about 15 years ago. He was very proud of it, but then the paper was crisp and the string didn't sag quite so much and the cotton beard was full and fluffy. When Christmas was over, we stuffed it into the box with the other ornaments without too much care.

And then the next year, there it was, a bit crumpled but still intact. So we tossed it on the tree, went through another holiday season, and tossed it back in the box.

And then the next year…and the next…and the next. It survived the move to Pennsylvania, and another move to Minnesota. It got a little tattier every time, but still, despite being such a fragile and impermanent thing, it survived. That moment every year when we opened the old Christmas box and we found ol' Santa lying a crumpled heap in the corner was a kind of triumph.

I identify with that Santa. Every year we're a little more raggedy, stretched a little thinner, a step closer to disintegration, and the kids don't find us so attractive any more, not that we were exactly dashing to begin with—but look, we're still here, and still smiling.

And someday we're going to go looking for him and he'll have deteriorated beyond repair, and I'll feel a moment of loss. But damn, for a scrap of tissue and fluff, he sure has had a good run.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/1682/Qnmx73Bs/

Comments:
#10843: — 12/11  at  08:33 PM
Utah? University of Utah?

When were you there? No doubt long after I left (in 1975).

In the biology building? Whose lab?



's avatar #10844: PZ Myers — 12/11  at  08:40 PM
I was there from 1987-1993, in Mike Bastiani's lab (he started there just shortly before I got there, so you probably didn't know him.) It was a good place, although I was there during the Pons/Fleischmann debacle, which wasn't the best time to be a Utahn.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#10855: charlie wagner — 12/11  at  09:51 PM
You should have one made of glass, it'll last forever.
This was made by my oldest daughter in first grade from a baby food jar, filled with sand and painted. It comes out every christmas when we all get together. It's 30 years old.



Merry Christmas.
I hope you don't find coal in your stocking!



#10856: bitchphd — 12/11  at  09:53 PM
That's lovely. We still have ornaments my sister and I made when we were kids, out of salt ceramics. They're getting a little crumbly, but they still go on the tree--as will the ones pseudonymous kid made last year, and this year...



#10858: — 12/11  at  10:05 PM
Is it me, or does your "santa" look a little like Cthulhu?

That's 2 of last 4 posts, PZ. I'm starting to get a wee bit suspicious.

You're not going to start forcing this stuff into your kids' curriculum, are ya?

Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

-Jerry Garcia



#10859: charlie wagner — 12/11  at  10:12 PM
By the way, since you brought up Pons and Fleischmann and referred to their work as a "debacle" perhaps you missed the latest news: THEY WERE PROBABLY RIGHT!!

Headline from Pure Energy Systems:

Cold Fusion Heating Up -- Pending Review by U.S. Department of Energy: Phenomenon discovered by Fleischmann and Pons in 1989, then disavowed by the scientific establishment, but subsequently confirmed worldwide in thousands of experiments, may finally be recognized as a revolutionary discovery of science.

The New York Times reported on March 25, 2004, that the U.S. Department of Energy has decided to give cold fusion a second look. At a meeting with several top cold-fusion researchers, officials from the Department indicated that given the Matterhorn of experimental evidence that has accumulated over the past fifteen years, a second review was reasonable.

Charlie Wagner



#10870: — 12/12  at  01:22 AM
I'm a bit odd in that Christmas just doesn't feel right for me without a fake tree.

I grew up with a fake tree. There's just something about the annual ritual of going up in the attic and hauling down the old tree, wrapped in its decrepit dusty shroud.

A real tree is just lacking.



#10871: DarkSyde — 12/12  at  05:25 AM
Yeah I ahh...wouldn't have made out the Santa without the hint. At least you could eat the Cthulu Santa candy!



#10874: — 12/12  at  08:50 AM
I was going `aaahh' over it for some time before I read the text and realised that it wasn't meant to be a sleepy gerbil in a cute little red cloak. (The gerbil is facing left, with the cloak hanging down to touch its nose.)

Oh, and Charlie, if it had in fact been confirmed in 'thousands of experiments' (rather than in a couple of experiments with flawed experimental protocols), cold fusion would now be a hot topic of research. It isn't. And I don't think this is due to a vast conspiracy of the scientific establishment. A lot of people tried to replicate those results, and failed.

(Most scientists, in my experience, either are too busy to conspire, or can't see the point. The place to look when people --- like, oooh, creationists --- moan about conspiracy is at the people who are moaning about conspiracy the loudest. That's where you'll find it.)



#10876: charlie wagner — 12/12  at  09:25 AM
Nix wrote:
"cold fusion would now be a hot topic of research. It isn’t. And I don’t think this is due to a vast conspiracy of the scientific establishment. A lot of people tried to replicate those results, and failed."

I don't deny that many researchers failed to replicate these results. But there are good political reasons for the government to want to suppress this information. After all, we're fighting a multi-billion dollar war in Iraq for oil. And where do most researchers get the bulk of their funding? Connect the dots.



#10878: DarkSyde — 12/12  at  10:29 AM
Charlie the thing is that the same forces of greed and competition would be trying to secure cold fusion for themselves as would be trying to repress it. If the corporate/government/military/Illuminati conspircy was as effective as people sometimes seem to believe, then nothing new would ever happen. I don't know a stronger company monopoly than Bell Telephone and rhey got smoked by the governent and later by the internet.



's avatar #10880: Chris Clarke — 12/12  at  11:25 AM
I don’t deny that many researchers failed to replicate these results. But there are good political reasons for the government to want to suppress this information.


Damn that nefarious Bob Park and his evil henchmenpersons!

"I do not think we should antagonize the religious when it is not warranted, though I think we should be willing to do so whenever it is.”
-- Glen Davidson



#10900: — 12/12  at  07:43 PM
That's a very nice Christmas tree, Myers.



#10942: — 12/13  at  09:29 AM
My sister has a stand alone Santa made from a lantern chimney (those glass thingies that go over the flame) - she made it in Bluebirds in 1958. My oldest ornament dates from 1968. The family has a package decoration - a star in oh so 60's groovy colors - that I 'm sure we've used since '67. Mom still alternates who's present if goes on each year so we don't fight.



#11153: — 12/15  at  12:23 PM
That's a nice ornament. I saw it very clearly as a flamingo, instantly and then in detail, before reading your description, though. It only has a body, a head, a curved neck, an eye, a bill, and two long legs, one of which is bent. And all the parts are the right color, except the legs.



Page 1 of 1 pages

Next entry: Fools to the right of me

Previous entry: Horns, tooting of

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college